There comes a time when lies, rolled in lies, get out of hand.
We've all done it. We told mom we had to work but when dad called your office you said it was a business trip but when sis called you answered the phone at home and the lies compounding the lies get out of hand.
Lying is not easy. It's an art. It requires not just a mischievous nature and willingness to deceive but a real talent for order, logic and miscalculation. And great acting.
Bill Clinton was a triumph in lying. Just recall his visit to Normandy.
Hillary was not as successful. Sniper fire in Bosnia, her own namesake- all proven to be lies. Hillary is not as good as Bill.
Nancy Pelosi is now proven to be a bad liar- which is not necessarily a bad thing. But Madam Speaker does find herself in a career damaging (and potentially a career ending) string of lies. I was at the brief but I wasn't briefed. I was informed about a briefing but was never told of the briefing. There were two briefings. The CIA is lying, not me. Bush did it.
When tricky Dick Nixon got caught in his web of lies finally the press asked the famous "what did the president know and when did he know it?". I am waiting for such bluntness from the press today.
When campaigning Senator Obama was stuck in his lies about Rev. Wright and David Ayers and Tony Rezko (and abortion and Jerusalem and Iran and, well, everything else...) he was able to skirt the issue assisted by an allied press and was never asked to fess up. But that was a campaign- and let's face it- the campaign is a glorified trailer compelling you to buy a ticket and see the movie.
Nancy Pelosi is in campaign mode but not in a campaign. Lambasting the Bush Administration and deriding the CIA may be popular in Merin County and win her support from the left, but this is Congress now and she is tempting fate with her poorly conceived lies.
What did the Speaker know and when did she know it?
The CIA will not bend over and take it. Not when they are claled liars, and not by a politically motivated politician.
nancy is in a pot of water and the gas was just turned up. Careful nancy- it could be boiling pretty quickly.
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Fly Over Country
That's the political phrase for states, cities, peoples who really don't matter in an election. Politicos spend time in St. Louis and Kansas City, but the rest of Missouri is "fly over country".
For President Obama's White House- all of America is fly over country. Not just figuratively, but literally.
I was voluntering on Monday morning when a Priest friend got a frantic call on his cell. A passenger jet was flying low over NYC being chased by fighters. Her building was evacuted.
Then the Priest got another call. Then another. What was going on?
A photo-op.
That's what the Obama White House thinks of America. America is a backdrop. America is a prop. No matter the cost ($385,000 is some cost) and without care for the impact on the environment (what's the "carbon footprint" on that photo?) and where is green-Hollywood to decry this wasteful contribution to global warming?) and without any sensitivity for millions of New Yorkers, someone ordered a photo of Air Obama over flyover country.
I don't have close friends who died on 9-11, but like most New Yorkers I know several people who were killed that awful day. Low flying planes over Manhattan isn't just "reminiscient" of that day. It is that day.
I can't imagine what would have happened should Winston Churchill have wanted to make a documentary in 1948 and, to create the necessary effect, turned on the air raid sirens throught London one night. Imagine the panic as our English friends sitting at home hear those chilling alarms which had been silent for years. Imagine the ANGER when they learn that it was planned, and not as an unannounced drill, but as part of an ad campaign.
This photo shoot is indicative of what Rush Limbaugh called a 9-10 mentality- and should evoke tremendous concern among all Americans. What kind of people go forward with such a plan without even considering the general public?
But worse, not in terms of national security but because of human character, is the utter belief that Americans, their fears, their concerns, their issues, are ancillary to Obama's needs and promotion. Americans are secondary. Americans are expendable.
Monday's photo shoot over New York City is a dangerous window into the Obama White House. If this is what they think of Americans, and the way they plan on using their power and piggy banks to promote themselves, we have much to fear.
For President Obama's White House- all of America is fly over country. Not just figuratively, but literally.
I was voluntering on Monday morning when a Priest friend got a frantic call on his cell. A passenger jet was flying low over NYC being chased by fighters. Her building was evacuted.
Then the Priest got another call. Then another. What was going on?
A photo-op.
That's what the Obama White House thinks of America. America is a backdrop. America is a prop. No matter the cost ($385,000 is some cost) and without care for the impact on the environment (what's the "carbon footprint" on that photo?) and where is green-Hollywood to decry this wasteful contribution to global warming?) and without any sensitivity for millions of New Yorkers, someone ordered a photo of Air Obama over flyover country.
I don't have close friends who died on 9-11, but like most New Yorkers I know several people who were killed that awful day. Low flying planes over Manhattan isn't just "reminiscient" of that day. It is that day.
I can't imagine what would have happened should Winston Churchill have wanted to make a documentary in 1948 and, to create the necessary effect, turned on the air raid sirens throught London one night. Imagine the panic as our English friends sitting at home hear those chilling alarms which had been silent for years. Imagine the ANGER when they learn that it was planned, and not as an unannounced drill, but as part of an ad campaign.
This photo shoot is indicative of what Rush Limbaugh called a 9-10 mentality- and should evoke tremendous concern among all Americans. What kind of people go forward with such a plan without even considering the general public?
But worse, not in terms of national security but because of human character, is the utter belief that Americans, their fears, their concerns, their issues, are ancillary to Obama's needs and promotion. Americans are secondary. Americans are expendable.
Monday's photo shoot over New York City is a dangerous window into the Obama White House. If this is what they think of Americans, and the way they plan on using their power and piggy banks to promote themselves, we have much to fear.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Obama the low-self-esteem President
Perhaps Obama's biggest weakness is his weakness.
Obama reminds me of one of those high school underclassman who wanted desperately to be popular with the seniors.
It's as if his biggest fear in life is to be rejected.
It's not merely a political weakness; it's a psychological weakness. One can observe the vital importance of acceptance in Obama's facial expressions and posture. Recall the election day victory speech in Grant Park on November 7th. For minutes on end, Obama stood before the crowd, not waving, not smiling, not pointing willy nilly to some random person and giving a thumbs-up a la Clinton, not holding his kids like Palin. Obama basked in his glory. A stern countenance, chin slightly upturned, Obama allowed himself to be celebrated. It was an affirmation, and Obama feeds off of affirmation.
Obama's weak psyche is, partially, understandable. Quite frankly, who wants to be another Bush? or Rove? or Rick Santorum??? No one wants to be demonized, parodied, mocked relentlessly by a merciless press and late-night comics. It makes sense that a political personality, elected by the people, should strive to be accepted by a majority of them (especially when he needs the masses one more time in 43 months time...).
But this need to be popular, to be loved and celebrated, is carried into a dangerously weak foreign policy. Rather than stand on principles, Obama is ruled by personality. The cordiality with which he greeted Chavez (who called Obama's predecessor "the Devil" and could "smell the sulphur) demonstrates weakness. In Obama's mind, he is the anti-Bush, and therefore his persona will win over Chavez. In the dictator's mind, Obama is just another gringo President, but unlike Bush, this one can be manipulated. What Obama sees as a foreign policy gain is actually an international loss. But he's too naive to tell the difference. After all, he is popular and isn't that all what matters?
Yet look at the comments made by French President Zarkozi. Tempting Obama to walk on the waters of the English Channel is such an immature joke, a rude and crass joke made about the American President... why Zarkozi say it? Because he doesn't take Obama seriously. Obama has become the joke.
Kim Jung Il would not have restarted their nuclear program under Bush. Maybe the 6 party talks weren't wholly successful, but they did retard the crazy Korean's nuclear progress.
Then there is Amadinejad. And Qadafi- the leader who, under the Bush Administration, surrendered his entire arsenal of weapons.
Obama's cavalier attitude towards the Queen coupled with a kowtow to the Saudi King, the outreach to Castro and the snub of Gordon Brown, the relentless America-bashing around the world stages from Europe to Mexico- these are all signs of a weak man who craves popularity.
America doesn't need another weak President. Remember Carter?
As Obama goes about trying to become the most popular Sophomore in high school, what he really does his embarrass himself and degrade the office of the President. I cannot imagine Bush shaking hands with a man who called Clinton "the devil". Nor can I imagine Clinton doing that either... dare I say Clinton had more confidence in himself and in his office.
Obama just looks like a fool. Yeah, sure, the seniors may talk to him more than other sophomores. But they also make fun of him publicly. They will use his house to throw a party, but they will trash the place, break his mom's pearls and drive off in his dad's Rolls Royce with the prom queen.
In his mind, Obama thinks his popularity will lead to success. And for that he is personally happy and feels fulfilled as the world leader. But he leaves a path of destruction that someone will have to clean up.
Obama reminds me of one of those high school underclassman who wanted desperately to be popular with the seniors.
It's as if his biggest fear in life is to be rejected.
It's not merely a political weakness; it's a psychological weakness. One can observe the vital importance of acceptance in Obama's facial expressions and posture. Recall the election day victory speech in Grant Park on November 7th. For minutes on end, Obama stood before the crowd, not waving, not smiling, not pointing willy nilly to some random person and giving a thumbs-up a la Clinton, not holding his kids like Palin. Obama basked in his glory. A stern countenance, chin slightly upturned, Obama allowed himself to be celebrated. It was an affirmation, and Obama feeds off of affirmation.
Obama's weak psyche is, partially, understandable. Quite frankly, who wants to be another Bush? or Rove? or Rick Santorum??? No one wants to be demonized, parodied, mocked relentlessly by a merciless press and late-night comics. It makes sense that a political personality, elected by the people, should strive to be accepted by a majority of them (especially when he needs the masses one more time in 43 months time...).
But this need to be popular, to be loved and celebrated, is carried into a dangerously weak foreign policy. Rather than stand on principles, Obama is ruled by personality. The cordiality with which he greeted Chavez (who called Obama's predecessor "the Devil" and could "smell the sulphur) demonstrates weakness. In Obama's mind, he is the anti-Bush, and therefore his persona will win over Chavez. In the dictator's mind, Obama is just another gringo President, but unlike Bush, this one can be manipulated. What Obama sees as a foreign policy gain is actually an international loss. But he's too naive to tell the difference. After all, he is popular and isn't that all what matters?
Yet look at the comments made by French President Zarkozi. Tempting Obama to walk on the waters of the English Channel is such an immature joke, a rude and crass joke made about the American President... why Zarkozi say it? Because he doesn't take Obama seriously. Obama has become the joke.
Kim Jung Il would not have restarted their nuclear program under Bush. Maybe the 6 party talks weren't wholly successful, but they did retard the crazy Korean's nuclear progress.
Then there is Amadinejad. And Qadafi- the leader who, under the Bush Administration, surrendered his entire arsenal of weapons.
Obama's cavalier attitude towards the Queen coupled with a kowtow to the Saudi King, the outreach to Castro and the snub of Gordon Brown, the relentless America-bashing around the world stages from Europe to Mexico- these are all signs of a weak man who craves popularity.
America doesn't need another weak President. Remember Carter?
As Obama goes about trying to become the most popular Sophomore in high school, what he really does his embarrass himself and degrade the office of the President. I cannot imagine Bush shaking hands with a man who called Clinton "the devil". Nor can I imagine Clinton doing that either... dare I say Clinton had more confidence in himself and in his office.
Obama just looks like a fool. Yeah, sure, the seniors may talk to him more than other sophomores. But they also make fun of him publicly. They will use his house to throw a party, but they will trash the place, break his mom's pearls and drive off in his dad's Rolls Royce with the prom queen.
In his mind, Obama thinks his popularity will lead to success. And for that he is personally happy and feels fulfilled as the world leader. But he leaves a path of destruction that someone will have to clean up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)